Randomness Vs Arbitrariness Author(s) : ZAHA HADID Source: AA Files, No. 2 (July 1982), P. 62 Published By: Stable URL: Accessed: 12/06/2014 21:22 [PDF]

Citation preview

RANDOMNESS vs ARBITRARINESS Author(s): ZAHA HADID Source: AA Files, No. 2 (July 1982), p. 62 Published by: Architectural Association School of Architecture Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29543327 . Accessed: 12/06/2014 21:22 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp



. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].



.



Architectural Association School of Architecture is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to AA Files.



http://www.jstor.org



This content downloaded from 91.229.248.139 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:22:39 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions



ZAHA HADID



RANDOMNESS



To most people



vs ARBITRARINESS



thereisno



apparent difference eitherconceptually or visuallybetweenrandomnessand to thisbasic arbitrariness. It isdifficult



as a difference scientifically. it formula, Treated becomes even mathematical more although of abstract,ability theprinciple to distinguishing between the thetwois conceptual the analyse difference demonstrate



through abstraction. pure architectureis a Randomness visual of orderand translation logic, in



mathematical



thinking whichis guidedby



whereas arbitrarinesshas no is not to underlying do with conceptual logic pure -randomness formalism- to aspects. It is demonstrate allathedifferent those necessaryto use like mathematical symbols of equation - which is again are we obscure. saying?Aren't we So our what just actions? tryingto justify



This isdifficult.Ithas alwaysbeen a problem tryingto translate because



the field of 'explanation*



not necessarily



is limited, the forces at play are



those of conventional



spiritual nor cosmic nor religious.



it's neither



earthly nature;



It is impossible



the implications of the writings and manifestos the merits of his writings are no parallel



to summarize



of Malevich,



and



to those of his paintings.



This has to do with the inabilityto translate. He had to resortto and



metaphysical comprehensible: Arbitrariness [brought up



spiritual



he dressed has



concepts



to make



the work



it in a language which was



to do with



a generation



on shopping for ideas. A catalogue



which



familiar. has been



exists from which



theyfreelycopy anythingand apply itwith littlerelevanceto any] Isituation. But



in architecture our responsibilities



are far greater:



we must create a new dynamics of architecture inwhich the land is partially occupied.



We must



understand



the basic principles



i



62



AA FILES



This content downloaded from 91.229.248.139 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:22:39 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions



no.2