19 0 7 MB
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file.
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file.
GRLWEAP14 - Introduction
Quality Assurance for Deep Foundations
Brent Robinson, Ph.D., P.E. [email protected]; [email protected] www.pile.com | [email protected] Pile Dynamics, Inc. 2021
Developments 1800s 1850s 1950: 1960s 1976: 1980s: 1986: 96, 06, 16: 1998: 2005: 2010: 2021:
Closed Form Solutions First Energy Formula Smith’s Wave Equation Dynamic Testing and CAPWAP WEAP, TTI GRLWEAP Hammer Performance Study FHWA Driven Pile Manual updates Software released on windows Inclusion of SA for WEAP CPT, API static Analysis + Offshore Version GRLWEAP 14 www.pile.com | [email protected]
Energy Formula Energy of the Hammer
Energy into the soil
E.A.L. Smith stated in his 1962 ASCE paper on Wave Equation that the editors of Engineering‐News Record had more than 450 different dynamic formulas on file. www.pile.com | [email protected]
WAVE EQUATION OBJECTIVES Smith’s Basic Interest: • Replace Energy Formula • Use improved models
• elastic pile • elasto-plastic static resistance • Viscous dynamic (damping) resistance
• Allow for realistic stress calculations
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Main Menu The program represents a major rewrite since the program was updated from DOS to windows Workflow is very similar with some notable differences
www.pile.com | [email protected]
GRLWEAP14 Hammer Selection Hammer Model Database of hammers similar to previous version (ID, Maker, etc.) Hammer must be added to the analysis Allows the user to select multiple hammers for one pile/soil combination!
www.pile.com | [email protected]
GRLWEAP14
Hammer Parameters Hammer Parameters unchanged But…
www.pile.com | [email protected]
What does hammer efficiency mean? EP = WR h EP = WR h η EK = ½ mR vi2 mR = WR / g EP = EK
(potential, ideal) (η = Hammer efficiency )
WR
vi
WR
(kinetic energy)
𝑖
www.pile.com | [email protected]
WP
h
GRLWEAP hammer efficiencies ηh = Ek/EP • The hammer efficiency reduces the impact velocity of the ram; it is based on experience • Hammer efficiencies cover all losses which cannot be calculated • Diesel hammer energy loss due to precompression or cushioning can be calculated and, therefore, is not covered by hammer efficiency www.pile.com | [email protected]
Hammer Options Stroke Settings Note that fuel settings can be adjusted to unique values for individual hammers
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Main Menu Pile / Cushion Pile Properties and hammer cushion properties are largely unchanged from the previous version [F3] will still call the: • Drive system database • Area calculator • Cushion material properties database Note the ability to model incline from the MM www.pile.com | [email protected]
Pile Input The Pile Input button opens up the realm of nonuniform piles
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Pile Profile Customize… Opens the Pile Table For those who prefer the traditional entry method
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Pile Builder Similar to the way the Offshore pile builder worked User builds a non-uniform pile segment by segment Each segment will allow for changes in properties (like a tapertube)
www.pile.com | [email protected]
GRLWEAP14 Capacity Selection Bearing Graph capacities unchanged • Increment • Interpolate • Auto Populate
www.pile.com | [email protected]
GRLWEAP14 Main Menu Some things missing from the Main Menu Screen: • The choice in switching from a simple, variable or detailed resistance distribution • The option to switch from a uniform, non-uniform, or two pile analysis (latter was rarely used) Note: these features are still in the program, but just not as prominent. www.pile.com | [email protected]
Main Menu Soil Parameters Note the ability to define a soil distribution shape is now removed from the program The program forces the user to create a basic soil profile or create a relative distribution • Requires more engineer input • Allows program to choose recommended quake and damping values www.pile.com | [email protected]
Soil Input Options The program forces the user to create a basic soil profile or go to the trouble of creating a relative distribution Greatly Expanded Static Analysis Options • FHWA • •
Nordlund Tomlinson
• API2 •
CPT based analysis
• Alme and Hamre (A&H) •
CPT based analysis www.pile.com | [email protected]
Resistance Distribution To define: • Triangular distribution •
Choose two layers with 0, 1
• Constant distribution •
Choose two layers with 1, 1
Note for a standard bearing graph it is far more important to model the appropriate: • Resistance distribution • Toe quake • Shaft damping www.pile.com | [email protected]
Static Analysis Options SA, ST, etc. largely unchanged Note that you can adjust the water table from the main window without having to use the settings
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Quick Output A quick output can be viewed by clicking the button. The user needs to hit the button to re-analyze the solution
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Analyze and got to Output Analyze and got to output button Analyzes the current solution and goes directly to output
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Output Bearing Graph Review results Output is created in the reporting options
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Output Variable vs time Ability to change plots Copy/paste data Right-click over graph or table
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Output Extrema Results Copy/paste data Right-click over graph or table
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Output Summary Report Will include the: • Bearing graph • Hammer summary • Quake damping • Graphic display of the resistance dist • Table • FOR ALL HAMMERS
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Output Standard Report Will Include: • Bearing Graph • Table summary • Soil profile table showing SA • Pile Profile Table • Hammer and drive system summary tables • Relative dist table
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Output Numeric Output Output show much clearer organization allowing user to navigate to desired capacity/depth
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Don’t Do it!
Do this instead
BIG Reminder!!! Out of habit, existing users will be tempted to hit the X to close the output window but this is actually the program, not an external window.
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Driveability Switching over to drivability again controls are very similar to before
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Driveability S1 table is now showing details similar to what we are used to in the previous program
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Driveability Depth Table is simplified Allows the user to switch hammers during a driveability analysis But where are the hammer property options?
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Driveability
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Driveability Allows for different settings for various depths as we are used to
www.pile.com | [email protected]
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file.
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file.
GRLWEAP14 – Static Analysis Options
Quality Assurance for Deep Foundations
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Foundation Design
Soil Borings
Geotech
Driveability
GRLWEAP
Analysis
Static Soil Resistance Analysis
Bearing Graph
Foundation/ Pile Type (Local ) Experience
Pile Testing www.pile.com | [email protected]
GRLWEAP 14 Soil Resistance Methods 4 Existing methods
8 New - GW14 - methods
• • • •
• API2
ST: Soil Type (Density and Stiffness) SA: N, φ, Su (β-Method?) API: Soil type, φ, Su Schmertmann CPT
• • • • •
Soil type: φ, Su Simplified ICP-05 University of Western Australia UWA-05 Fugro-05 Norwegian Geotechnical Institute NGI
• FHWA/DRIVEN • Nordlund • Tomlinson
• A&H Friction Fatigue Method www.pile.com | [email protected]
Soil Resistance Calculation For Bearing Graph:
For Driveability:
1. Relative shaft resistance distribution 2. % shaft resistance 3. Other Parameters (Averaged)
1.
Accurate Statice Resistance Calculation (12 Methods) SRD Determination
2. 1. 2.
3.
Setup Factor Friction Fatigue
Other Parameters (Each Layer)
www.pile.com | [email protected]
The Background Report – Part 2
www.pile.com | [email protected]
The Background Report – Part 2
www.pile.com | [email protected]
GW 14 SA Change For known φ end bearing now calculated after Fellenius (2014). See Background, Part 2 Before: φ SPT-N qtoe = 200 N (kPa) Now:
φ Nt qtoe = Nt po’
www.pile.com | [email protected]
The FHWA/DRIVEN Method Encompasses two Methods Tomlinson for clay Nordlund for sand The Manual on the Design and Construction of DRIVEN Piles describes both methods A DRIVEN soil resistance program was written for FHWA by others both for design and input generator to GRLWEAP In the early days of the Manual, Tomlinson and Nordlund were the best available for typical relatively small land piles. www.pile.com | [email protected]
FHWA/DRIVEN – Nordlund Sand bearing layer Example 27GWA c
www.pile.com | [email protected]
FHWA/DRIVEN – Nordlund Sand bearing layer
www.pile.com | [email protected]
FHWA/DRIVEN – Nordlund
LT Shaft Resistance at 10, 20 , 30, 40, 50 ft depth Scale normalized. www.pile.com | [email protected]
Static Resistance to Driving Soil Resistance Analysis LTSR
Friction Fatigue 3 Choices
Standard Setup
SRD Driveability Analysis
The idea behind friction fatigue: the longer a pile shaft has moved through a layer, the more the layer loses shaft resistance.
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Friction Fatigue Options GRLWEAP 14 offers 3 ways of applying FF 1. Choose Alm and Hamre analysis, enter CPT, choose soil layers (e.g., automatically). 2. Externally calculate A&H parameters, copy and paste. 3. Perform any SRA other than A&H, choose non-standard fsu, shape factor, Limit length; hope for the best or obtain local experience (compare with driving logs).
www.pile.com | [email protected]
Difference between Setup and FF Analysis Standard Setup
For each layer: SRD = LTSR/fsu
The resistance of a soil layer is uniformly reduced by its fsu
Friction Fatigue
Typically for long offshore piles
SRD equivalent to Rex Rresidual