26 0 1 MB
progetti
Front End Engineering Design (FEED) Challenges in EPC Projects: Design, LLI Strategy & Fast Track
By Armando Bianco, Engineering Manager, Eniprogetti Global Conference on EPC Contract & Project Management 9th-10th November 2017 Lisbon, Portugal
Index
Eni
Design Basis, Key Deliverables & Battery Limits: how to approach a Front End Engineering Design Balance between engineering freezing and early procurement: Long Lead Items strategy Fast Track: Basic, FEED & Detail Design phases in overlap aiming at Project goals Conclusions
2
eniprogetti
Eni
3
eniprogetti
Design Basis, Key Deliverables & Battery Limits: how to approach a Front End Engineering Design
4
eniprogetti
Oil and Gas Project Development Phases
Pre-feasibily 1-3 MM (typical ref.)
Basic - FEED 3-9 MM (typical ref.)
Feasibility 2-4 MM (typical ref.)
G1
G2
Detail Design & Procurement 9-18 MM (typical ref.)
Construction Commissioning 12+ MM (typical ref.)
G3
Execution: detailed development and physical realizatio of the scope of the project’s ork Definition: finalization of the development concept Selection: choice of optimal development configuration Appraisal / Evaluation: assess e t of the opportu it ’s eco o ic alue
Project expenditure Capital Risk Difficulty to implement changes Personnel involved Stakeholders’ e pectatio s
Time 5
eniprogetti
Project Development Phases Key Activities -> Key Deliverables (es. for process and piping and layout engineering) Pre-feasibily 1-3 MM (typical ref.)
Feasibility 2-4 MM (typical ref.)
Basic - FEED 3-9 MM (typical ref.)
Detail Design & Procurement 9-18 MM (typical ref.)
Construction Commissioning 12+ MM (typical ref.)
Support to Construction and commissioning Feasibility 3D model Detail Engineering Design Procurement and Construction
Finalization of all processes, utilities and transportation systems. Design of all engineering systems Constructability reviews finalization
Preparation of process specifications, design criteria, for all processes , utilities and transportation systems. Preliminary engineering, safety and constructability.
Identification and analysis of the main process and utilities for each generated concept alternative
6
Technology selection report Preliminary Heat & Material balance Block Flow Diagram Preliminary Site Plan
Red-marked and as-built
P&ID (with vendor information) Equipment DS (for all items) Details MTO (2nd and 3rd) Isometrics Construction drawings Stress Reports
Finalization of Heat & Material balance, P&ID & Equipment and packages DS Plot Plan, Equipment layouts, Underground layouts Finalization of Technical Specifications (Stress analysis Criteria) Single lines for steel structures Preli i ar MTO’s Pipi g ( st MTO) Process Flow Diagrams Battery Limits Table Preliminary P&I Ds Equipment Data Sheets Design Criteria Preliminary Plot Plan
eniprogetti
How Design Basis, Key Delivery and B.L. can affect a Project What if… … Desig Bases are not finalized Example: the pressure of the Sea Water Make-up (rely upon information) was significantly different from the reality. Technical resolution: lower the pumps with an additional basin (groundwater level very high). Impact: additional costs and delay in schedule
… Key Deliverables are not ready as needed Example: the supply of a critical reactor was assigned to a vendor in the Far East and a shipping to North Africa was fixed in advance. Due to the delay in the 3D model, the nozzle orientation was not ready as per original plan agreed with the vendor resulting in late finalization of the vendor engineering and eventually of the supply. Recovery plan: an acceleration plan was agreed with the vendor to meet shipping window. Impact: additional costs
… Battery Li its are not aligned (process-wise) Example: two different mechanical contractors were assigned to install the cooling water circuits in the relevant area and a battery limits was established. During the commissioning phase after the battery limits were connected it was noticed that one contractor inverted the connection from a process point of view. Technical resolution: the connections were modified during commissioning and with acceleration in procurement for the unforeseen additional material during commissioning Impact: delay during commissioning phase 7
Note: Lesson Learnt not related with ENI projects
eniprogetti
Why Basic-FEED is the most important part of a Project?
value
Pre-feas. Feasibility 1-3 MM 3-6 MM (typical ref.)
$
Basic - FEED 3-9 MM (typical ref.)
Detail Design & Procurement 9-18 MM (typical ref.)
Construction 12 – 32 MM (typical ref.)
BOQ & Construction strategy
Material Selection & Take-off
Peak Construction Cost
Peak Material Cost
8
Construction Commissioning 12+ MM (typical ref.)
Project Cost Curvet Availability of Information time
During Basic – FEED project costs can be properly evaluated by finalization of material selectio a d MTOs, owi g to that this phase is the ost i porta t for the go/ o go final assessment
eniprogetti
Design approach – Key points
The Basic - FEED engineering shall be tailor fit to allow the correct definition of the i vest e t cost a d to support the go / o go decisio gate 3 (key deliverables fit for purpose to the activities and not vice-versa); In Basic – FEED phase, the key deliverables allow to fix the material selection and estimate material take-offs which are the input for the procurement and construction strategy based on the project drivers;
9
eniprogetti
Balance between engineering freezing and early procurement: Long Lead Items strategy
10
eniprogetti
Long Lead Items definitions
Those components of a system or piece of equipment for which the times to design and fabricate are the longest and for which an early commitment of funds may be desirable or necessary in order to meet the earliest possible date of system completion.
11
eniprogetti
Critical Path
The critical path is the sequence of activities that represents the longest path through a project, which determines the shortest possible project duration [PMBOK 6.6.2.2 Critical Path Method] Appling Critical Path method for all the systems of a project, even material with a rather short delivery can result to be critical, owing to that we can split LLI in two categories:
Typical LLI such as: • High pressure equipment • High temperature equipment • Special Material equipment
Not Typical LLI such as: 12
• Tie-ins: integration with existing Facilities • Bulk material for early commissioning system
eniprogetti
Tie-ins: integration with existing Facilities REFERENCE GREEN-FIELD PROJECT SCHEDULE Pre-feas. 1-3 MM (typ.Ref.)
Feasibility 3-6 MM (typ.Ref.)
Detail Design & Procurement 9-18 MM PROCUREMENT FOR TRADITIONAL LLI PROCUREMENT FOR LLI ref.) (typical
FEED 3-9 MM (typical ref.)
Construction 12 – 32 MM (typical ref.)
EARLY ENGINEERING
Commissioning 3- 12 MM (typical ref.)
EARLY CONSTRUCTION
EARLY PROCUREMENT EARLY COMMISSIONING
TIE-INS
PRODUCTION PLAN of EXISTING FACILITIES UNIT 10
Shutdown
UNIT 20
Production Dismantling Dismantelling Dismantelling
Plant to be disinvested Shutdown
UNIT 30
Shutdown
Production
OVERALL SCHEDULE INTEGRATED WITH PRODUCTION PLAN FEED Feasibility Study
13
TIE-INS
TIE-INS INSTAL.
Shutdown
TIE-INS INSTAL. Detail Design & Dismantling Procurement Construction
Commissioning
Tie-ins shall be planed in an early stage of the project, with a dedicated engineering, construction and commissioning team. The project schedule incorporates the production plan in terms of turn-around or critical milestones.
eniprogetti
Bulk Material for Early Commissioning System Engineering design for bulk material is aimed to produce MTOs with increased levels of definition
Procurement generally follows the MTO by engineering based on master agreements or project agreements
Construction strategy is divided into: 1st phase by area 2nd phase by system
14
During the engineering phase it is important to verify that the delivery of bulk material fits the Mechanical Completion dates (additional specific MTOs can be envisaged).
eniprogetti
Long Lead Items strategy – Key points
The critical path developed for all the project systems allows us to recognize critical delivery items which do not have the longest delivery such as tie-ins or bulk material for early commissioning system, which shall be focused since the start of the project with a dedicated integrated team (engineering, construction and commissioning); For a revamping project, the integration of the production plan in the project baseline allows to execute tie-ins during turn-around, minimizing the number of shut-downs and avoiding unnecessary loss of production;
15
eniprogetti
Fast Track: Basic, FEED & Detail Design phases in overlap aiming at Project goals
If you're not confused, you're not paying attention. Tom Peters
16
eniprogetti
Project objectives and Fast-Track Projects
Pre-feas. 1-3 MM (typ.Ref.)
Feasibility 3-6 MM (typ.Ref.)
Basic - FEED 3-9 MM (typical ref.)
Detail Design & Procurement 9-18 MM (typical ref.)
Construction 12 – 32 MM (typical ref.)
Commissioning 3- 12 MM (typical ref.)
• Opt.1) Compress the activity lengths Pre-F.
Feasibil.
FEED
Detail Design & Procurement
• Opt.2) Fast-Track by parallelization of phases Feasibility Study FEED Detail Design & Procurement
17
eniprogetti
Possible outcomes when implementing a Fast-Track in a project
Relying upon preliminary information
Design based on assumptions Increased interface management
Overdesign material
More Engineering Man-hours
Higher Cost Increased possibility of inconsistencies
18
Higher Risk
Not linear approach in decision making
More Reworks
More difficult engagement of personnel
Which it the greatest objective?
eniprogetti
How to mitigate risks in fast-track projects
Re-cycling Design inputs/outputs
Feasibility Study
FEED Detail Design & Procurement
D
Final alignment MATERIAL When procurement cycle is long, procurement can be start with preliminary data, updating more consolidated information during the vendor alignment before PO MATERIAL TEAM Material check/re-rated If the approach is aligned is re-consolidated both in since the beginning with a Basic and Detail Design common goal, all the team to avoid reworks during is aimed to support construction and unavoidable project changes commissioning and reworks activities
ENGINEERING Final alignment mitigates risk of further phases for critical aspects
ENGINEERING Preliminary information evaluated from Basic (used for detail design) are always re-checked when more information are available
19
eniprogetti
Case Study
Feasibility Study
FEED Detail Design & Procurement
D
Project Organization Engineering Approach: Re-cycling Design 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
20
Process and Layout for critical circuit 3D Model Review 30% and 60% Material Selection Vendor design Design Philosophy – Operating manual
eniprogetti
Case Study Organization Chart
CONSTRUCTION
LICENSOR FEASIBIL. CNT
FAST-TRACK
DETAILED ENG.
FEASIBILI TY PREBASIC FEAS. FEED
OWNER
BASIC –FEED CONTRACTOR
DETAIL ENG. CONTRACTOR VENDOR
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR
SUB. CONTRACTOR
SUB. CONTRACTOR
VENDOR
VENDOR
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR
SUB. CONTRACTOR
Interface Management
SUB. CONTRACTOR
eniprogetti
#1: Process and Layout for critical circuit
File EST9 EST9 EST9 EST9 EST9 EST9 EST9
1) PRELIMINARY SIZE CALCULATION & PLOT PLAN
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
by
Case
2) PROCESS SCENARIOS (DESIGN CASES AND TRANSIENTS) SA SA SA SA SA SA SA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
PUMP DISCHARGE
FV s Valves Flow FVA
FVB
PSVs Valves Flow FVC
PSVA
PSVB
PSVC
A B C IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 351 351 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 250 250 250 250 250 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 351 351 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 351 250 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 250 250 250 250 250 250 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 250 250 250 351 351 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 351 250 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 351 250 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 250 250 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 351 351 351 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 In Process: Pump Nozzle Alignment for installation case, Pumps ABC at ambient temperature , piping not anchored to the pumps.
CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER CEER
CEER
4
CEER
CEER
4
CEER
In Process: Pump Nozzle Alignment for maintenaince case, Pump A, B or C as spare.
CEER
4
CEER
In Process: Tracing Failure Scenario analysis
OUT 351 380 5 250 351 351 250 x 250 250 250 250 351 351 351 380 250
3) STRESS CRITERIA WITH PRELIMINARY CRITICAL VERIFICATION AND TYPICAL DETAILS
4) 3D LAYOUT
6) UPDATING PROCESS LINE CALCULATION & PLOT PLAN
5) STRESS CALCULATION
BASIC-FEED CONTRACTOR
22
DETAIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
eniprogetti
#2: 3D Model Review 30% AND 60%
23
DETAIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
BASIC-FEED CONTRACTOR
BASIC-FEED CONTRACTOR
DETAIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
eniprogetti
#3: Material Selection (Piping)
Fluid list
Piping Classes
Process Fluid List
Vendor Follow-up Material Requirements
BASIC-FEED CONTRACTOR
24
Material requisition & Purchase Order
DETAIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
eniprogetti
#4: Vendor design
Process DataSheet
Material Requisition
Mechanical and Material Check Vendor Follow-up BASIC-FEED CONTRACTOR
25
DETAIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
eniprogetti
#5: Design Philosophy – Operating manual
Updated Control Philosophy
Updating Process Design Design Operating Scenarios Scenarios Process Philosophy
BASIC-FEED CONTRACTOR
26
Operating Manual
DETAIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
eniprogetti
Fast Track – Key points
The Fast Track with parallelization of phases which traditionally are developed sequentially is a possible strategy to meet Project Objectives when the schedule is challenging; To mitigate the risk associated to fast track (more interfaces, reworks, designing by conservative assumptions rather that consolidated data etc.) project team needs to be integrated with an interface management plan and dedicated engineering methods such as re-cycling and final alignment need to be set-up in the engineering execution plan.
27
eniprogetti
Conclusions - Key Factors for Basic-FEED Projects
28
Tailor fit Design by Project Objectives Advanced monitor of costs with correct Basic-FEED data System-wise approach since the beginning of the project For revamping, integration of project schedule with production plan Interface management, re-cycling and final alignment for fast-track project
eniprogetti